TESDA Rationalization Plan
(Based on EO 366)
Table of Contents
|
|
PAGE |
|
Acronyms |
1 |
|
I. Introduction |
4 |
|
A.
Background |
4 |
|
B.
Rationalization Principles |
4 |
|
C.
Rationalization Process |
6 |
|
II. TESDA’s Mandate |
11 |
|
III. TESDA’s Vision, Mission, and Value
Statement |
11 |
|
IV. TESDA’s Core Business |
11 |
|
V. Structural and Functional Shifts |
14 |
|
A.
Existing Structure |
14 |
|
B.
Rationalized Structure |
18 |
|
VI. Rationalized Staffing Pattern |
23 |
|
VII. Rationalized Personnel Complement |
25 |
|
VIII. Rationalization Plan Summary |
26 |
|
A. Providing Equitable Manning Via
Scrap and Build Strategy |
27 |
|
B. Retiring Personnel Under EO 366 |
28 |
|
C. Addressing 41 Additional Position
Requirements |
28 |
|
IX. Synthesis |
29 |
|
X. Annexes |
|
|
A. DOLE Form 1 (Structural and
Organizational Shift) |
|
|
B. DOLE Form 2 (Staffing Pattern
Shift) |
|
|
C. DOLE Form 3 (Proposed Personnel
Placement) |
|
|
D. DOLE Form 4 (List of
Redundant,Obsolete and Unnecessary Positions Including
Affected Personnel |
|
|
XI. References |
|
|
A.
EO 366 |
|
|
B.
IRR of EO 366 |
|
|
C.
TESDA Orders (CMT Creation, etc.) |
|
Acronyms
|
Accounting
Division |
AD |
|
Budget
Division |
BD |
|
Competency
Assessment and Certification Office |
CACO |
|
Corporate
Affairs Office |
CAO |
|
Certification
Division |
CD |
|
Career
Guidance and Incentives Division |
CGID |
|
Corporate
Information and Advocacy Division |
CIAD |
|
Change
Management Team |
CMT |
|
Central
Office-Regional Office-Provincial Office-Training Institutions |
CO-RO-PO-TI |
|
Curriculum
and Training Aids Division |
CTAD |
|
Deputy
Director General |
DDG |
|
Director
General |
DG |
|
Department
of Labor and Employment |
DOLE |
|
Executive
Director |
ED |
|
Financial
and Administrative Services Division |
FASD |
|
Facilities
and Equipment Management Division |
FEMD |
|
Field
Operations Monitoring Division |
FOMD |
|
General
Services Division |
GSD |
|
Human
Resource Management Division |
HRMD |
|
Information
and Communication Technology |
ICT |
|
Korea-Philippines |
Kor-phil |
|
Korea-Philippines
Vocational |
KPVTC |
|
OCSA
Legal |
LEGAL |
|
Manpower
Information Systems Division |
MISD |
|
National
TVET Trainers Development Institutes |
NTTDI |
|
Office
of Apprenticeship |
OA |
|
Office
of the Chief of Services for Administration |
OCSA |
|
OCSA
Proper |
OCSA Proper |
|
Office
of the Deputy Director General Field Operations |
ODDG-FO |
|
Office
of the Deputy Director General Sectoral TVET |
ODDG-ST |
|
Office
of the Director General |
ODG |
|
Office
of the Executive Director |
OED |
|
Office
of Formal TVET |
OFTVET |
|
Office
of Non-Formal TVET |
ONFTVET |
|
Office
of the Provincial Director |
OPD |
|
Office
of the Regional Director |
ORD |
|
Office
of TESDA Institutions |
OTI |
|
Office
of TESDA Technology Institute |
OTTI |
|
Provincial
Director |
PD |
|
Programs
Development Division |
PDD |
|
Planning
Office |
|
|
Provincial
Offices |
POs |
|
Policy/Program
Coordination Division |
PPCD |
|
Policy
and Planning Division |
PPD |
|
Policy
Research & Evaluation Division |
PRED |
|
Personal Services |
PS |
|
Procurement
and Supply Division |
PSD |
|
Programs
and Systems Development Division |
PSDD |
|
Personal
Services Itemization and Plantilla of
Personnel |
PSIPOP |
|
|
PTC |
|
Quality
and Data Management Division |
QDMD |
|
Qualifications
and Standards Office |
QSO |
|
Regional
Coordination Office |
RCO |
|
Regional
Director |
RD |
|
Research
and Evaluation Division |
RED |
|
Regional
Operations Division |
ROD |
|
Regional
Offices |
ROs |
|
|
RTC |
|
Specialized
Centers |
SCs |
|
Systems
Development and Networking Division |
SDND |
|
Skills
Standards and Certification Office |
SSCO |
|
Skills
Testing and Certification Division |
STCD |
|
Standards
and Test Development Division |
STDD |
|
Technical
Education and Skills Development Authority |
TESDA |
|
Technical
Education and Skills Development Specialist |
TESDS |
|
Training
Institutions |
TIs |
|
Technical
Research and Development Division |
TRDD |
|
TVET
Systems Development Office |
TSDO |
|
TESDA
Technology Institute Manpower Operation Division |
TTIMOD |
|
Technical
Vocational Education and Training |
TVET |
|
|
|
|
SCHOOLS |
|
|
Agusan
del Sur School of Arts and Trades |
ADSSAT |
|
|
ANTS |
|
|
ASAT |
|
Arteche
National Agricultural School |
ANAS |
|
|
BCSAT |
|
Balangiga
National Agricultural School |
BNAS |
|
|
BCAT |
|
|
BSF |
|
|
BPTI |
|
Bulusan
National Vocational |
BNVTS |
|
|
BSAT |
|
|
CSHCI |
|
|
CNSAT |
|
Cagayan
de Oro (BUGO) School of Arts & Trades |
COSAT |
|
|
CNVS |
|
Camarines
Sur Institute of Fisheries and Marine Science |
CASIFMAS |
|
|
CSAT |
|
Carmelo
de los |
CCSNTS |
|
|
CVS |
|
|
DNAS |
|
|
DSF |
|
Dumalag
Vocational |
DTVS |
|
|
GSNSAT |
|
|
GPSAT |
|
|
ISAT |
|
|
JZGMSAT |
|
|
KNVS |
|
Kasibu
National Agricultural School |
KNAS |
|
Kinoguitan
National Agricultural High School |
KNAHS |
|
Lanao
del Norte National Agro-Industrial School |
LNNAIS |
|
Las
|
LNAIHS |
|
Lasam
National Agricultural School |
LNAS |
|
Lazi
National Agricultural School |
LAZI |
|
|
LGPC |
|
|
LMMSAT |
|
|
LSF |
|
Maddela
Institute of Technology |
MIT |
|
|
MAIS |
|
Marikina
Institute of Science and Technology |
MIST |
|
|
MSF |
|
|
MSAT |
|
National
|
NCTESD |
|
National
Institute for Tech-Voch Education and Training |
NITVET |
|
New
|
NLPC |
|
Northern
Mindanao |
NMSF |
|
|
OAIS |
|
|
PCF |
|
|
PSAT |
|
|
PTS |
|
|
PPSAT |
|
Quezon
National Agricultural School |
QNAS |
|
|
STS |
|
|
SNSAT |
|
San
Francisco Institute of Science and Technology |
SFIST |
|
San
Vicente Pilot School for Philippine Craftsmen |
SVPSPC |
|
Simeon
Suan Vocational and Technical College |
SSVTC |
|
Sorsogon
National Agricultural School |
SNAS |
|
Southern
|
SICAT |
|
Surallah
National Agricultural School |
SUNAS |
|
Surigao
del Norte College of Agriculture and Technology |
SDNCAT |
|
|
TWC |
|
|
TPSAT |
|
Wangan
National Agricultural School |
WNAS |
TESDA Rationalization Plan
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Background
To improve government performance and institute reforms to transform the bureaucracy into an efficient and result-oriented structure, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo issued EO 366. The Executive Order directs a strategic review of the organizations and its operations of the Executive Branch and provides options and incentives for employees who may be affected by the rationalization of functions in government agencies.
In response to EO 366, TESDA maximized the opportunity to provide a structure and manning that will ensure high quality provision of services to its internal and external customers. TESDA strengthened its core functions and widened its clientele/geographic coverage by consolidating the resources and optimizing outcomes in the Central Office-Regional Office-Provincial Office-Technology Institution (CO-RO-PO-TI). It is expected that with this undertaking, this will strategically position the organization towards gaining grounds in “Winning the Future in TVET” as a main rallying point.
B. The
Rationalization Principles
TESDA declared the following principles in the rationalization process:
PGMA’s 10-point Agenda. For the past 11 years, TESDA has brought the whole range of technical vocational education and training (TVET) programs and services to many people. In support of the President’s 10-point Agenda, TESDA is enhancing its systems and translates them into meaningful and tangible results to be able to contribute to the country’s development for the next six years.
Paradigm Shifts. The TESDA Board approved the five essential paradigm shifts of TESDA which embodied the strategies that guarantee an expanded provision of quality services to its clientele, partners and the people. The following are the five essential paradigm shifts that have been adopted:
It should be emphasized that the major strategy in the implementation of these paradigm shifts is TEAMWORK. TESDA shall, in cooperation of the various agencies, BLE/POEA/DOLE, DTI, DILG, DENR, CHED, DepEd, and the civil society hopes to create more opportunities for the advancement of the Filipino workforce.
Teamwork through collaboration with DOLE takes the form of interfacing activities along promotion of employment and manpower development to support employment promotion and employment facilitation services to clients. These strategies have been established through the development and maintenance of a computerized job matching facility accessible to all Public Employment Service Offices (PESOs) nationwide and the Philippine Overseas Labor Offices (POLOs) and a computerized national registry of skills, employment and business opportunities for easy access of its clients. For this purpose, the Phil-JobNet serves as the basic Labor Market Information System (LMIS) which shall be continuously enhanced and upgraded. Along with this initiative, TESDA and BLE with its Regional Offices implement the Kasanayan at Hanapbuhay (KasH) to strengthen and expand the existing employment facilitation service machinery of the administration.
Doing More with Less. Despite its scarce resources, TESDA commits itself to increase productivity and efficiency in the delivery of TVET programs and services.
No Fallout Policy. Secretary Augusto Boboy Syjuco has assured each and every TESDAn that everybody will be taken cared of and has committed to a “No Fallout Policy.” He stands firm in his commitment that all TESDAns are counted in. Likewise, the TESDA Core CMT emphasized the need to manage the “organizational change with a heart.” It underscores the importance of participation of the rank and file in the rationalization process.
Limited Relocation of Staff. While relocation is inevitable, the TESDA Rationalization Plan ensures that the effects of dislocation is minimized and appropriately addressed.
Life after TESDA. For those who opted to be separated
from the service, there is life after TESDA.
It has been ensured that retirement benefits are available to the
retirees. TESDA shall harness and tap the capabilities of its retirees in its
programs and projects to ensure that they will have productive post-retirement
opportunities.
Manpower Downloading. Several studies underscore the need for TESDA to rationalize allocation between the central and the field offices not only of financial resources but human resources as well. Manpower requirements are to be downloaded to strengthen the field operations.
Consolidation/Networking of TESDA Training Delivery System. Likewise, the TESDA training institutions shall be networked within the context of TESDA Schools-cum-training centers and Training Centers-cum-schools to move towards a more effective and efficient delivery of programs and services. A committee under the stewardship of RD Washington M. Agustin crafted the Framework/Guidelines on the TESDA Training Institutions Delivery/Network System.
Participation and Ownership. This principle calls for the active participation of TESDA officials and the rank and file in the entire rationalization process. The bottom line is participation, consensus building and ownership. TESDA recognizes that this organizational change has to be owned and managed at all levels in the organization.
Upholding the Value of HR in the Organization. TESDA believes that its people are the most important asset of the organization. Thus, a sustained internal capability build-up program through a purposive career development for each TESDAn is being put in place. The Staffing/Manning component was taken care of by the respective officers of CMTs to ensure that the right people with the right competencies are matched with the right job in the organization.
C. The
Rationalization Process
The preparation of the TESDA Rationalization Plan underwent a series of participative discussions at the different levels of the organization. Agreements from the different consultation-workshops, meetings, and conferences were integrated and served as major inputs in the Plan. It is a collaborative, collective effort of the management and the rank-and-file to redefine the ultimate role and the appropriate responses of TESDA in TVET.
Prior to the amendment of the composition of the Core Change Management Team (Core CMT) on May 19, 2005, the TESDA-ACE conducted a Rationalization Plan Workshop last April 12-14, 2005. A total of 63 officers and staff from TESDA’s central, regional and provincial offices, training centers and schools participated in the workshop on crafting a proposed organizational structure for TESDA. During the workshop, the participants were provided with inputs from different speakers. DOLE Assistant Secretary Ma. Anthonette Velasco-Allones discussed the salient points of EO 366. Mr. Harry A. Abrillo, a member of the three-man Independent Review Panel (IRP) presented the findings and recommendations of the five-year performance of TESDA from 1995 to 2000. Mr. Abrillo emphasized that the “heart and soul of TESDA is certification and closely intertwined with its registration and accreditation programs.” He added that TESDA should get away from direct training provision and should focus on its role as a manager, regulator, enabler, and a promoter of TVET. Mr. Ken Manson, a TESDA consultant and team leader of the Technical Education and Skills Development Project (TESDP) discussed the findings and recommendations of an Organizational Development Study, which he conducted in TESDA. Mr. Hilario Martinez presented the findings of the organizational diagnosis conducted by TESDA 2001 OD Standing Committee that suggested redefinition of the organizations functional structure. ED Clifford Paragua clarified some points in the proposed creation of a number of offices and the realignment and assignment of new and additional functions. Secretary Augusto Boboy Syjuco gave insights relative to the paradigm shifts of TESDA and emphasized that the crafting of the TESDA Rationalization Plan is a critical stage in the life of the organization.
The TESDA-ACE drew up a structure that was considered during the Interim CMT Study Group discussions last May 16, 2005 and National Directorate Conference held on May 17-19, 2005 wherein the recomposition of the Core CMT was recommended by the ND. Thus, the recomposed Core CMT has been chaired by DDG Milagros Dawa-Hernandez and co-chaired by EDs Agripina P. Zafra and Clifford A. Paragua. The members of the Core CMT include:
|
1. ED Irene M. Isaac
- Executive Office 2. ED Elmer K. Talavera - Executive Office 3. RD Valerio Rola -
RD for 4. RD Ernesto Beltran
- RD for Visayas 5.
RD Roberto Braga -
RD for Mindanao 6.
PD Felisa Carag -
PD for Luzon 7. PD Gaspar Gayona
- PD for Visayas 8. PD Edwin Gatinao
- PD for 9.
Mr. Roberto Niez -
TI Luzon 10. Dr. Zenaida Fajardo -
TI Visayas |
11.
Dr. Francisco Dela Pena - TI Mindanao 12.
Mr. Lamberto Jos -
TI Mindanao 13.
Ms. Laureana Marcos - ManCom 14.
Mr. Elpidio Mamaril, Jr. -
ManCom 15.
Ms. Sonia Lipio - ACE Natl. Pres. 16.
Mr. Artemio Pulido -
ACE Luzon 17.
Mr. Loreta Banario -
ACE Visayas 18.
Ms.June Tanquieng - ACE Mindanao 19.
Ms. Ava Heidi Dela Torre - ACE Central Office 20.
Ms. Ma. Veronica Sandoval - HRMD
|
The CMT’s functions include the following:
§ Conducts a strategic review of the operations and organization of all component units of the Authority;
§ Identifies functions, programs, activities, and projects which can be scaled down, phased out or abolished or those which need to be strengthened;
§ Prepares a Rationalization Plan;
§ Conducts consultation meetings with the affected personnel and other stakeholders;
§ Oversees the actual implementation of the Rationalization Plan;
§ Mitigates the impact of the rationalization effort; and,
§ Coordinates and consolidates the processes and outputs of the area CMTs.
Likewise,
a secretariat for the Core CMT was also created to provide the much
needed backstopping support through a TESDA Order.
TESDA’s rationalization efforts were intensified with the establishment of a network of Change Management Teams (CMTs) in various levels of the organization, i.e. Core CMT, Executive Office CMTs and Regional Office CMTs (CMT Advisory # 1 - May 25, 2005). This network served as a system with synchronized activities and facilitated active and timely exchange of information in the entire organization. Presentation materials on Managing Change and all other relevant references were discussed by respective Regional/Provincial Directors and Executive Directors with Area CMTs.
Area CMTs were established at the Executive and Regional Offices. The CMT for each Executive Office is composed of the Executive Director, Chiefs, Union Representatives, other Change Agents, and supported by a Secretariat. The CMT for each Regional Office is composed of the Regional and Provincial Directors, TI Administrators, Chiefs,
Union Representatives, Change Agents and supported by a Secretariat. Change agents were also identified to be part of the Team. A change agent is an enthusiast for change who can pass his/her enthusiasm to others. He/she takes pivotal role in the rationalization process. Each Area CMT was required to submit all of its consultation/meeting proceedings to the Core CMT secretariat for documentation/consolidation.
An orientation-briefing was conducted last June 1, 2005 by the DBM representative for TESDA Core CMT and shed light to some crucial issues on EO 366 and its implementing rules.
The Core CMT prepared the Communication Plan which has three major components – Rationalization, Retirement and Relocation (3Rs) that present the integrative flow of the imperatives and implications of the rationalization plan. This scheme facilitates transparency, openness, and active participation/involvement of TESDA officials and the rank and file in the rationalization process (planning, development and implementation).
TESDA’s proposed structure as agreed during the ND Conference on May 17-19, 2005 was presented to DOLE CMT last June 6, 2005 prior to the TESDA Organization-wide synchronized orientation/briefing held from June 8 to 10, 2005. TESDA employees were provided with a TESDA rationalization orientation kit for their reference.
On June 21, 2005, the TESDA Rationalization Staffing/Manning Activities and Guidelines were issued through CMT Advisory # 5. Area CMTs were advised to prepare their respective personnel inventory and matching of existing personnel per EO/RO/PO/TI and inventory of those who opt for retirement or relocation within and outside TESDA. The Core CMT members were tasked to assist the Area CMTs in one or more regional offices in the inventory of their manpower. The Core CMT members and their regional assignments:
|
PD Felisa Carag
- |
Regions I, III and CAR |
Mr. Roberto Niez - |
Regions
IV-A and V |
|
RD Valerio Rola - |
Region II |
Ms. Sonia Lipio - |
Region IV-B |
|
PD Gaspar Gayona - |
Regions VI and VII |
Ms. Loreta Banario - |
Region VIII |
|
PD Edwin Gatinao
- Mr. Lamberto Jos
- |
Region X |
Dr.FranciscoDela Pena - Mr. Lamberto Jos - |
Regions
IX,XI and XII |
|
PD Edwin Gatinao - |
CARAGA |
Mr. Elpidio Mamaril, Jr - Ms. Ava Heidi dela Torre - |
NCR |
The Core CMT members presented
the inventory and matching of existing personnel for the RO-PO-TI and the
inventory for those who opted for relocation (within and outside TESDA) or for
retirement during the Core CMT Meeting on June 27 to July 1, 2005. A number of
issues were discussed and agreed upon to include among others the following:
1) Transparency shall be fully exercised as part of the process; 2) To facilitate the process, the principle of downloading to people in the RO-PO-TI shall be explained to the staff to allay possible anxiety; 3) Signatures of the Area CMTs are required along with each personnel/staff in the submission of manning; 4) Office functions shall be treated as fundamental and generic, including overlaps/duplications to be properly addressed; 5) Decentralization of the management of Staff Development Program (SDP), and 6) What to do with QMS in TESDA?
From then on, synchronized consultations-discussions and study groups were conducted as integral part of the rationalization process that led to the finalization of the Plan.
The TESDA CMT output as of July was submitted in the ND Conference last July 21, 2005. A discussion paper on the TESDA Rationalization Plan was presented that included the principles, proposed structure and staffing pattern. Focals per area (Luzon/Visayas/Mindanao) presented their respective tentative manning list. The ND agreed that in the second round of the rationalization plan preparation, the itemized plantilla positions shall be indicated.
On August 15-26, 2005, the Core CMT and the Human Resource Management Officers (HRMOs) of the TESDA Regional Offices did the finalization of the manning list for the RO-PO-TI. On August 18, 2005, the Appeals Committee was established through CMT Advisory # 13.
Finalization and packaging of the TESDA Rationalization Plan was conducted from August 27-September 12, 2005.

II. TESDA’s MANDATE
The “Technical Education and Skills Development Act of 1994” created TESDA under Republic Act. No.7796. The said Act integrated the functions of the former National Manpower and Youth Council (NMYC), the Bureau of Technical Vocational Education (BTVE) of the Department of Education, Culture, and Sports (DECS), and the Apprenticeship Program of the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE). The essence of TESDA’s existence is to enhance employability of the middle-level workforce through the provision of relevant, accessible, high quality and efficient technical education and skills development (TESD) responsive to and in accordance with the Philippine Development Goals and Objectives.
TESDA’s goals and objectives are very clear. They define the primary output of TESDA which is quality middle-level manpower who can cope up with the demand of global competitiveness. This entails acquisition of competencies at par with international standards including critical and creative thinking, as well as positive work attitudes and values.
These goals and objectives call for a Pro-Active TESDA that acts as catalyst in a labor-market directed, private sector-led and market-driven TVET.
III. TESDA’s VISION,
The vision, mission, and value statement of TESDA express its highest aspirations and reasons for being and serve as the unifying framework for all its activities.
Vision. TESDA is the leading partner in the development of the Filipino workforce with world class competence and positive work values.
Value Statement. TESDA believes in demonstrated competence, institutional integrity, personal commitment and deep sense of nationalism.
IV.
TESDA’s
CORE BUSINESS
TESDA’s role in workforce development is defined by quality products and services in the areas of Direction Setting, Standards Setting and Systems Development, Support to TVET Provision, and Institutional Capacity Building which are its core business.
The TESDA’s Core Business is to provide national leadership in developing a skilled workforce in the country. Primarily, this involves ensuring sufficient provision of skilled workers and technicians to meet international work standards as well as the needs of local enterprises. It also includes ensuring access to technical education for the greater majority of the Filipinos.

Direction Setting. Central to TESDA’s role as an authority and national leader in TVET is being able to provide a clear sense of direction to the TVET sector.
Standards Setting and Systems Development. TESDA as a national leader shall be responsible for ensuring quality in all aspects of TVET. The key element is standards which refer not only to skills of the workforce and the TVET institutions but also to processes and systems adopted in the sector. These standards are benchmarks against which we can measure performances of workers and students, as well as TVET institutions.
Support to TVET Provision. TESDA is responsible to ensure that opportunities in TVET are available whether they are provided by the government or the private sector. As the Authority in TVET, TESDA provides technical supervision over the various public
and private TVET providers. Focus shall be given in building the capability and capacity of TVET providers, including the LGUs, as well as providing scholarship to the beneficiaries.
Institutional
2nd Cycle NTESDP 2005-2009. One major tangible output of TESDA under its Direction Setting concern is facilitating the crafting of the medium term plan for the TVET sector. The Plan defines the TESD response to the national development challenges of poverty alleviation through economic growth. It envisions a globally competent Filipino workforce able to produce quality products and services either in the domestic or overseas market. It commits to deliver improved access and equity in TVET, improved assessment and certification, and enhanced employability of TVET graduates.
TVET interventions are to be oriented towards social integration, rural development and global competitiveness. Core strategies include private-sector and market-driven TVET, pro-active job-skills matching, life-long learning mechanisms, expanded TVET scholarships and other support services, enhanced quality assurance mechanisms, entrepreneurship in TVET and convergence. These strategies and programs are crucial on the way TESDA configures the organization.
The TESDA Corporate Plan. TESDA’s work processes for the next ten years will be synergy from teamwork. Teamwork with public and private technical vocational institutions, enterprises, workers groups, LGUs, civil society organizations, national government agencies and other client groups.
TESDA’s role as enabler through formulation of policies, development of systems and standards in TVET shall be the dominant characteristic of TESDA for the next five years. Capability building programs shall be vigorously implemented to promote and sustain quality provision. The enabled partners are expected to expand their capability to facilitate the development of a more competent Filipino workforce.
TESDA is reconfigured in order to implement purposive capability building programs for the LGUs, the enterprises, the private TVIs, the NGOs and other National Government Agencies to assume more active role in workforce development
The TESDA HRD Plan. The Plan has lined up interventions towards committed and competent TESDAns. Aligned to TESDA’s belief that its people are the most important asset of the organization, the organization is putting in place a sustained internal capability build-up program through a purposive career development program for each TESDAn.
With all the efforts poured in the rationalization process, the expected result is a strengthened and revitalized TESDA manned by committed personnel with demonstrated competence and responsive to the roles of TESDA as a regulator, enabler, promoter and manager of the TVET Sector towards a globally competent Filipino Workforce.
V. STRUCTURAL AND
FUNCTIONAL SHIFTS
A. Existing Structure
Republic Act No. 7796 otherwise known as the Technical Education and Skills Development Act of 1994 created TESDA to promote and strengthen the quality of technical education and skills development program for international competitiveness and to meet the changing demands for quality middle-level manpower in the country. TESDA is an attached agency of the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) and the Authority is composed of a Board and a Secretariat. It is primarily responsible for the formulation, coordination and integration of TESD policies, plans and programs.
The TESDA Board is a multi-sectoral policy-making body, chaired by the Secretary of Labor and Employment and co-chaired by the Secretaries of Education and Trade and Industry. The Secretaries of Agriculture, Interior and Local Government as well as the Director General of the TESDA Secretariat, complete the government sector representatives. In addition, the President appointed representatives from the private sector, employer/industry organization, labor sector, and national associations of private technical vocational and training institutions.
The TESDA Secretariat on the other hand, is headed by a Director-General (DG) who exercises general supervision and control over its technical and administrative staff.
The Director-General is assisted by two Deputy Directors General (DDGs). One DDG is responsible for Policy and Planning and the other is responsible for Technical Vocational Education and Training (TVET).
Likewise, the DG is assisted by the Chief of Services for Administration. The Office of the Chief of Services for Administration (OCSA) responds to logistics, safety and security requirements, physical facilities, provides legal services; and promotes the well-being of the organization’s personnel through its programs.
Also, under the direct supervision of the ODG is the International Project Development Unit (IPDU) which leads in project development, monitors and integrates all Official Development Assistance (ODA).
The presence of a TESDA Board Secretariat also reporting to the DG but closely interfacing with both TESDA Board and TESDA Secretariat Offices, facilitates the staff support requirement of the TESDA Board.


The ODDG for Policy and Planning Cluster is headed by Deputy Director General Milagros Dawa-Hernandez. Under this Cluster are two Executive Offices:
The ODDG for Technical Vocational Education and Training Cluster is headed by DDG Santiago M. Yabut, Jr. Under this Cluster are four Executive Offices:
Under the direct control of the Director-General are the Regional Offices (ROs) which are headed by a Regional Director. The ROs serve as the Secretariat to the Regional Technical Education Skills Development Committees (RTESDCs). The ROs provide effective supervision, coordination and integration of technical education and skills development programs and projects and related activities in their respective jurisdictions and likewise develop and recommend TESDA programs for regional and local-level implementation within the policies set by the Authority.
The Provincial Offices (POs) headed by a Provincial Director are also directly under the control of the Director General. They serve as the Secretariat to the Provincial Technical Education Skills Development Committees (PTESDCs). The POs provide technical assistance particularly to LGUs for effective supervision, coordination and integration of technical education and skills development programs and projects within their localities and review and recommend TESDA programs for implementation within their localities.
Structural and Functional Shift

The shift underscores the merger of plans, policies and systems into one cluster. This defining shift in the governance of TVET has been clearly positioned under the Sectoral TVET Cluster. On the other hand, the enabling role of the Authority is lodged under the Field Operations Cluster. This is exemplified in the development function of the OTTI through TTIOD which signals the trainer development requirement of TTIs and to be implemented by NTTDI. Such programs in the field are expected to be efficiently synchronized and coordinated by RCO.
B.
Rationalized
Structure
The rationalized Organizational Structure of TESDA is a collective output of the TESDA management and the rank and file. The new structure aspires to realign TESDA’s functions as an Authority that will be more effective, market-driven, and private sector-led. The structure is referenced to what the organization affirmed and determined to do as a collective decision.
The two Offices of the Deputy Directors General (ODDGs) have been restructured considering the balance in the developmental work in one cluster and the integration and harmonization of field operations work in the other.
First is the ODDG for Sectoral TVET which has three Executive Offices:
Qualifications and Standards Office (QSO) - develops and establishes a national system of skills standardization, testing and certification in the country; establishes and implements systems of accrediting private enterprises, group of workers’ associations and public institutions; conducts researches and develops competency standards and develops curriculum exemplars, program standards and learning materials.

Under this cluster, the decision to simplify the similar functions of OFTVET, ONFTVET and the Office of Apprenticeship led to the integration of functions and programs of the three offices into one office or through the creation of the TSDO. The QSO on the other hand, was proposed based on recommendations from past studies to adopt continuous improvement as well as expedite the development of Competency Standards (CS) and promulgate Training Regulations (TRs) in a more systematized and efficient manner.
In the proposed set-up, one Executive Office takes care of facilitating the development of Competency Standards, Training Designs and Competency Assessment Instruments to address the efficiency concerns in the current set-up. With QSO, it will ensure that Assessment Instruments are available even before the promulgation of TRs.
The ODDG for Field
Operations will have the following offices under it:
The TTIs provide responsive formal and non-formal TVET programs; conduct applied research and development and conduct outreach programs in coordination with ROs/POs.
For 2005, the TTIs are directed to transition as a flexible TVET delivery network to maximize their presence in the area, optimize the use of their resources and to address the issue that TVET programs are costlier compared to college courses. This shall mean transforming the TAS also as training centers with short-term course offerings while TCs shall also offer long-term programs similar to TAS program offerings. With the transformation is the expectation that government- ran institutions shall be less costly, catering to a wider client base and perform better as government institutions. The TTIs are also expected to implement Village Technologies and Community-Based training programs to further enhance the productivity in the rural areas especially for the agriculture and the fisheries sector.
The intended devolution of the training function of TESDA as stipulated in its law has often been a concern in TVET. The TESDA Board has passed a resolution in 2004 adopting a "Progressive Decentralization" as a scheme to devolve TESDA's training function to partners. A number of TESDA Technology Institutions planned out a decentralization within a period of 30 years or until such time when the prospective partners are ready to assume management of the training delivery system.
It should be noted that the TESDA Development Fund, supposed to be the main source in enhancing the capability of the LGUS to eventually take on the training function responsibility failed to support the undertaking. With the TESDA's meager corporate resources, the capability of prospective partners shall still be pursued consistent with the intents of the 2nd Cycle National Technical Education Skills Development Plan (NTESDP), 2005-2009.
Under the second cluster, the proposal to create the RCO was based on the need to improve the coordination, synchronization of the implementation of programs, policies, standards and systems at the field level. It also aims to ensure that one office takes care of benchmarking field level best practices with the end in view of enhancing field level performance as a consolidated and integrated effort.
Also under the said cluster are all training delivery mechanisms within TESDA and this restructuring is expected to give focus to the continuous improvement of TESDA-ran training institutions. Through the creation of the OTTI, TESDA-ran institutions are expected to ultimately produce highly competitive graduates at reasonable cost. Under this cluster is the National TVET Trainers Institute (NTTDI), which is also envisioned to undertake the incubation of new training systems developed and as core developer of quality trainers.
The broken line connecting the Regional/Provincial Offices with the TESDA Technology Institutions highlights the area management principle and role (i.e. technical supervision role) of the Regional and Provincial Directors over the TESDA Technology Institutions (TTIs) in response to the requirements of the area. Likewise, it is incumbent upon the OTTI to render administrative and technical supervision over the TTIs to ensure more efficiency in the delivery of the TTIs’ programs and services.
Under the direct supervision of the Office of the Director General are the following offices/units:
shall now focus on
the implementation of Assessment and Certification function of TESDA. It will
be positioned directly under the ODG, to be headed by an Executive Director and
to work closely with a network of National Sectoral Assessment and
Certification Boards.
A more detailed
presentation of the function per office and at the division level can be found
in Annex
A.
VI. RATIONALIZED STAFFING PATTERN
The Central Office has 495 or 11.18% of the total number of plantilla positions (4,427) in TESDA. Under the Rationalization Plan, the Central Office only represents 405 of the total or 9.26% of the total plantilla positions.
Based on the position title description, the existing TESDA manning pattern comprising of 4,427 employees is dominated by the technical positions with 57.28% supported by 38.78% administrative staff. Under the Rationalization Plan, there is a net increase of 34 technical staff and a reduction of 92 administrative staff. There is a proposed increase in the technical staff (68) for the Field Operations (RO-PO-TI) and a reduction of 34 in the Central Office. For administrative positions, there is a planned reduction of 56 administrative positions (26.67%) in the Central Office and a reduction of 36 positions (2.39%) in Field Operations.
The Rationalization Plan staffing pattern summary of results depict a change from the existing total TESDA Plantilla Positions of 4,427 to (4,375) personnel, a net reduction of 1.2 percent. There was a reduction of 90 personnel from the Central Office from its original 495 plantilla positions or a reduction of 18.18%. More than a fourth (26.67%) of the existing number of administrative staff and about 13.55% of the technical personnel of the Central Office has either been transferred or rendered redundant under EO 366. The Field Operations increased from 3,932 to (3,970) or a net increase of (38) personnel or about one percent of its original manpower complement.

Details of the staffing/manning list shall be presented in the attached manning list per operating unit.
At the field level, the staffing
pattern for Provincial Offices (POs) is equitably expanded in recognition of
the varying magnitude of operations per area.
Several studies point out the need for POs to enhance its manning
support to better respond to area needs.
With the rationalization effort, and consistent with the principle of
manpower decentralization or downloading from the CO to the field level, the
POs shall be the main focus of the expansion effort. Equitywise, each
To maintain an adequate manpower complement in all TESDA TIs and consistent with the agreement of TI Administrators, Regional Directors and Provincial Directors a total of 10 non-teaching personnel was proposed per TI. All teaching staff on the other hand, shall be retained in their respective assignments respecting the provisions of the Magna Carta for Public School Teachers.
VII. Rationalized Personnel
Complement